Delhi Assembly elections 2025: SC grants 6-day custody parole to Delhi riot accused Tahir Hussain to campaign

File Pic

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted six-day custody parole to former AAP councillor and February 2020 riots accused Tahir Hussain, who is contesting on a AIMIM ticket, to campaign for Delhi assembly elections, reported news agency PTI.

Custody parole entails a prisoner being escorted by armed police personnel to the place of visit.

In Photos: New four-storey building collapses in Delhi`s Burari, two dead

1 day agoPHOTO GALLERY

A full bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta allowed Hussain's plea to campaign in police custody from January 29 to February 3, PTI stated.

Hussain would only be allowed to leave jail along with security for 12 hours, as per the jail manual, SC said.

The apex court said the former councillor could walk out of jail at around 6 am and return by 6 pm.

The bench said Hussain's custody parole would be subject to the deposit of Rs 2.47 lakh per day as part of security expenses, including the police escort, PTI stated.

Hussain should not visit his Karawal Nagar home, which is an alleged site of the 2020 riots, and also restrain from making any public comments over the case's merits, said the court.

SC's clarification of the order

The apex court clarified that the order will not be treated as a precedent as it was passed in the "peculiar facts and circumstances" of the case, PTI stated.

SC stated that Hussain's bail application in the Delhi High Court should be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the bench's order.

Senior advocate Siddharth Aggarwal, appearing for Hussain, argued only four-five days were left to campaign.

Aggarwal, according to PTI, said his client was contesting from the Mustafabad seat and he won't visit his house and stay at a hotel aside from sharing the details.

Additional solicitor general S V Raju opposed the plea, saying his role in the riots was serious. If granted the relief, said Raju, everybody would fill nominations in jail, reported PTI.

The apex court asked Raju to seek instructions on the expenses and security would be required and told Aggarwal to inform the undertakings Hussain proposed to give.

The order was passed on Hussain's plea to allow him to campaign in custody for the upcoming Delhi assembly elections 2025.

Previous plea failed to secure interim bail

Tahir Hussain failed to secure interim bail on January 22, after a two-judge bench of the apex court gave a split verdict.

The Delhi High Court granted custody parole to him on January 14 to file his nomination papers from the Mustafabad constituency in the national capital.

However, his plea was declined for interim bail from January 14 to February 9 to contest the February 5 election, saying the gravity of the allegations against Hussain, being the main perpetrator in the violence that resulted in the death of several people, could not be overlooked, reported PTI.

The Delhi high court, as per PTI, said 11 FIRs were lodged against Hussain in connection with the 2020 riots and he was admittedly in custody in a related money-laundering case and a case registered under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Delhi riots 2020

Violence broke out in northeast Delhi on February 24, 2020, leaving 53 people dead and several injured. Hussain is an accused in a case connected to the death of Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma.

According to the prosecution, on February 26, 2020, complainant Ravinder Kumar informed the Dayalpur police station that his son Sharma was missing since the previous day.

His body was reportedly found from the Khajuri Khas nullah in the riot-affected area and it bore 51 injuries, PTI stated..

On January 22, a Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and Ahsanuddin Amanullah delivered a split verdict on Hussain's plea.

While Justice Mithal dismissed Hussain's plea saying no case was made out, Justice Amanullah opined that he could be released on interim bail, PTI stated.

The judges asked the top court registry to place the matter before Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna for a new bench to decide the issue.

(With inputs from PTI)