30 November,2009 03:25 PM IST | | PTI
In a stern message to Pakistan, the United States has asked it to shed its policy of using insurgents like LeT as a strategic tool and warned that if it cannot deliver against terrorists, the US may be impelled to use any means at its disposal.
The message, which has been conveyed in a letter from US President Barack Obama to his Pakistani counterpart Asif Ali Zardari, also includes an offer by him to try to reduce tensions between India and Pakistan, media reported here.
The two-page letter, hand-delivered by National Security Adviser General (Retd) James Jones when he visited Islamabad early this month, offers Pakistan enhancement of strategic partnership if they act as wished by the US, besides additional military and economic aid.
In his letter, Obama has also warned Pakistan that its use of insurgent groups for policy goals cannot continue and called for closer collaboration against all extremist groups. He named five such groups - Al-Qaeda, the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Tehrik-e-Taliban.
ALSO READ
Black Warrant fame Rahul Bhat: ‘Newcomers must stop being social media wannabes’
Rajouri deaths: J-K chief secy orders strict containment measures to stop further loss of lives
Policeman tries to stop truck in 'no entry' area, driver runs him over
BJP govt unable to stop custodial deaths in UP: Akhilesh
Delhi court stops food brand from using '10X Shakti' trademark
"Using vague diplomatic language, he said that ambiguity in Pakistan's relationship with any of them could no longer be ignored," the Washington Post reported.
Jones did some straight-talking with the top Pakistani leadership, the daily said. "If Pakistan cannot deliver, he warned, the US may be impelled to use any means at its disposal to rout insurgents based along Pakistan's western and southern borders with Afghanistan."
The Post said US officials have long referred to Pakistani military and intelligence officers who are sympathetic to or actively support insurgent groups fighting in Afghanistan as rogue elements. More recently, they have described those relationships as more direct and institutional within a divided military.
"For the things that we care about," a US official was quoted as saying, "the real decision-maker is the military. "It has long been hedging its bets in Afghanistan; the military has positioned itself to prevent inroads by India in the event of a US withdrawal, and against a 30-year history of being used and then rejected by shifting US policy aims," it said.
